Monday, 29 March 2010
Pre-production report
Post-Production Report
This too was a very long and daunting process but one that had to be done none the less. Although capturing was easy some of the shots would not move from camera to computer due to the break in time. Due to the amount we had re-filmed we had a lot more to capture than most groups
Production Report
After finishing all our pre-production documentation we were ready to film. To do this we would need more than lesson timetable. We decided dates on which to film although these were not always met. We initially decided to film everything on one day but this didn’t happen due to people being free at different times. We ended up filming on a Friday this was because everyone was free but we did not get it all filmed because we could not al stay for the same amount of time. We managed to get the drag and dell scenes filmed on the first day of filming this however was not good because we had not completed our largest scene. Although there were obvious continuity errors we could not re-film this scene on that day because it was too muddy and beginning to rain. We Managed to get the rest of the scenes filmed through half term these were reasonably easy to film because it was mainly just walking through the woods. There were very few errors in filming at this point except there were a few shots that were in point of view but we were told that this would lose all of the tension that we have built up to this point. Although we did not always stick to the shot list because at the time of filming we did not see the shots fit, we have ended with a lot of shots that are good enough to sort through and cut together to create tension. We initially thought we had captured all the shots we could need but whilst editing we got feedback from peers and Mrs Shipp that we should re-film areas because they didn't look right or gave too much away. We ended up filming over several days because we were being exceptionally fussy in which shots to take. we managed to complete all filming only two weeks before the Easter break. There were a few shots that turned out really well like the attack scene which through a fault which ended in the stick breaking has actually given the effect that the hit was harder than it really was which makes this shot more believable. Most of the shots that we have filmed in the first few days of filming we have re-filmed and discarded.
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
Pre-production documents
The shot list is one of the most important parts of the production. It allows you to create most other documents requires in the pre-production area. The shot list shows you what shots you need to film of each scene and a description of each. The shot list is very important because without it you could not produce a film because there would be a lack of information about each shot.
Wednesday, 17 March 2010
Audience Feedback
During the process of getting audience feedback we screened our rough cut of our film to our peers and recorded their feedback. From personal reflection of our film there were a few issues with continuity due to the plastic bag we used to shield one of the actors from getting muddy. We found out the genre would be better expressed with the addition of music but is still expressed well at the moment. I don't think that we have given another option to whom the killer is but it was too late to change it. The film not exposing the killer as they strike the victim creates about who the killer is but as I said we haven't given any other option. The camera work of the film is mostly good with the exception of the handheld shots that was incredibly shaky. The mise-en-scene was good because the setting helps to establish the genre and also helped to build tension and anxiety. Both the sound and video quality were good and the levels of noise have been increased and reduced to make the sound stay at similar volumes and remove all interferences that were encounted. Before we screened the film to the class we re-filmed an area because we broke the 180 degree rule and have edited it to remove this shot and replace it with one that does not break the rule. The titles of the film are good and stay on there for a reasonable amount of time, the font that we have used is good as it helps elaborate on the genre. Overall I think that it is a good opening sequence and has improved due to the feedback we have received.
From other groups feedback we have received we have learned that the plastic bag that is still in the film is a major issue among our peers, other than that point the continuity of our film is good. A lot of the points that people picked out are similar to that I have. Most people also picked up on the establishment of the genre would be easier with music, but is easily established at the moment. There were also no major issues pointed out with the camera work except the shakiness of the handheld area. Although the titles were good there were a few problems with the names of the actors because they were put over areas of light and were in white. People wanted to keep watching the film because it left them in suspense and wanting to know what happens. Our peers said that the sound levels were good and that they did not notice the interference from the planes that were heard. Although they have said that the scenes of the victim walking through the woods seemed to drag on and got boring. Peers have also said that it creates and element of confusion about who the killer is which is a good thing, but does not allow for any other options.